When one is asked what they look for in a mate, naturally, one of the first things they mention is the person's looks. I don't know anyone who would (honestly) say that they want someone they don't find attractive. The ones who say or do such things, typically either lack self-esteem and will take anybody, and/or they have a hidden agenda.
Personally, I believe there has to be something outwardly appealing that initiates attraction. They don't have to be drop dead gorgeous or a lady killer, but there has to be something there that will initially draw you to that person. You can't see their inner qualities at first sight, you'll only find out where their head is (i.e. their personality, mindset, and attitude) afterwards.
They have this idea that one could look like a one-eyed martian, as long as they have an astounding personality, you should take them. Miss me with that foolishness. Another ploy that's used in this is shaming/pressure tactics. They attempt to make you feel guilty about YOUR personal preference, mind you, by ways of criticism, and in some cases, try to get you to settle and take the first person that smiles at you or shows you any attention beyond a smile.
I noticed a pattern that I find kind of funny with these individuals. Some of them who spew that rhetoric, tend to have someone who is attractive. He or she may not be a perfect 10, but they're not ugly. Since it's just the "inside that counts," I would like to see these substance warriors take someone who is unattractive.
I would like to see if the inside still counts if a celebrity they're head-over-heels in love with, had a mangled face. He or she could have a pleasant, down-to-earth personality among other good qualities, these people know good and well they would turn them down, if that were the case. It would be automatic if the celebrity is someone who is deemed as ugly by most people.
No comments:
Post a Comment